List of stock market tycoons who died due to heart attack in 2025

2025 turned out to be a very sadfully eventful year for the financial world, both for the stock market’s ups and downs, but for the unexpected and heartbreaking passing of many leading stock market barons and industrialists to cardiac arrests. From India’s thriving startup network to South Korea’s chaebols and the history of Silicon Valley venture capital, the sudden passing of these titans of industry triggered waves of chaos through global financial markets, devastated plans of succession, and raised alarming questions about leadership wellness and the vulnerability of corporate behemoths. Read on to learn about the important names lost in 2025, the industries they inspired, and the economic wake left by their sudden passing.

Stock Market Tycoons who died of heart attack

1. Amit Banerji – Founder & CEO, Table Space (India)

Amit Banerji, co‑founder and CEO of Indian co‑working behemoth Table Space, succumbed to a sudden heart attack on January 6, 2025, at age 45. Under his leadership, Table Space grew to a reported $2.5 billion valuation with ₹918 crore in FY 2024 revenue and ₹52 crore profit.His untimely death shocked India’s fledgling startup scene. With Table Space’s IPO timeline on hold, the company’s founding CEO departed—setting off alarm bells for investors and lenders.

2. C. Richard “Dick” Kramlich – Co‑founder, New Enterprise Associates (USA)

Richard Kramlich, 89, pioneering venture capitalist who co-founded New Enterprise Associates (NEA) in 1978 and funded early investments in Apple, died February 1, 2025.His departure definitely signals the end of an era for NEA. Well organized, deeply capitalized leadership aside, sentimentally, markets and tech startups looked back on his legacy. No new bombshell. Confidence continues to run high in NEA’s ongoing solidity.

3. Han Jong‑hee – Co‑CEO, Samsung Electronics (S. Korea)

Samsung co‑CEO Han Jong‑hee, 63 With all that staring at screens all day, Han must have been hard on the ticker—he died from a heart attack on March 25, 2025. He directed Samsung’s consumer electronics and smartphone business units, guiding its AI hardware, mobile and TV strategies.His death was immediately followed by a drop in Samsung stock market capitalization, a sign of investor anxiety. South Korea’s strategic tech industry didn’t take long to stop thinking strategically. Under the leadership of new sole CEO Young‑Hyun Jun, Samsung fought back fast, regaining the trust of the market.

Harvey Levin Net Worth: How TMZ and Business Ventures Built His Fortune

Why These Deaths Matter

1. Leadership Vacuum & Transition Risk: In each case, succession plans were put to the test. To Table Space, Banerji’s death put a wrench in its impending IPO. At Samsung, Jun Young‑Hyun’s swift takeover of power restored a firm under pressure back to healthy performance. At NEA, Kramlich’s passing was felt less as an operational loss and more as a symbolic loss.

2. Market Volatility & Share Prices: Samsung’s stock initially tumbled following Han’s passing, before rebounding as the firm signaled a clear and organized leadership succession plan. If anything, you might argue that it was absorbed without much bloodshed, but there was introspection in the venture communities.

3. Investor & Stakeholder Sentiment: Each shutdown caused emotional and reputational tsunamis: businesses closed for memorials and focused on known unknowns. As a founding legend of the industry, Kramlich’s departure gave rise to a wave of retrospectives in venture circles. Banerji’s death struck a chord among colleagues within India’s flourishing startup ecosystem. Han’s death immensely complicated the situation, putting severe pressure on Samsung to project calm and re-stabilize global markets.

In 2025, the aftermath of finance capital wheezy as generative collapse became the standard time-leading dynamic, the finance world in quick succession lost 8 influential captains to heart attacks— each leaving their unmistakably haunted shadows across global markets. Whether redefining NEA’s legacy, rocking Samsung’s consumer kingdom, or halting Table Space’s IPO aspirations, these incidents highlight how executive health disasters can shake up rulemaking capitals across global finance world.